On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:37, Sylvain Munaut <[email protected]> wrote: >> that might be an idea, but in fact it would be better to have the >> speaker be able to decide not to be recorded in the first place ;) > > Yes sure, I mean the speaker will be there, he can object directly, I > just meant it's more flexible if you don't have to act in real time. > If there are some part that shouldn't be published or are not relevant > or anything, or that the speaker is ok for private copy but not wider > distributions, ....
Yes, my proposal for the video recording was exactly like Sylvain proposed. I didn't mention asking people for permission as I see it as an implied prerequisite. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris.
