On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:50:43AM +0100, jolly wrote:
> yes, i missed that. but IIRC, it must be set on non-PCS cells (i.a. 850
> or 900) to indicate whether neighbor ARFCN of 512... refer to PCS. on a
> PCS BTS it should be ignored by MS.
right, as PCS/DCS is not allowed I take a look during the SI generation
and check if that bts is a DCS/PCS unit and set the indicator.
In terms of VTY we need to add consistency checks at the time of a 'write'
call and after loading. But this is not limited to the DCS/PCS code.
> if (n)
> ...
> si2->bcch_frequency_list[0] |= 0x20;
> si2b->bcch_frequency_list[0] |= 0x20;
>
> if there are frequencies defined in si2bis, the EXT-IND is set on both
> (si2 and si2bis) lists. if not, the si2bis is removed and not transmitted.
true. I was confused and thought EXT-IND is set for SI2ter as well. But
this is signalled in the SI3 rest octets. SI5ter doesn't appear to be
signalled at all.
greetings from Iceland
holger
