Hi Holger, On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 09:23:31PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 05:16:54PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > What is not done: > > > * Create a talloc pool for the primitives (or re-use the msgb across > > multiple > > reads). > > * The stress test is either showing memory fragmentation or a silent leak. > The virtual size of the address space is increasing over time, the talloc > report does not show an increase in memory usage and I switched off the bts > before I could look at vmRSS on the 'status' file.
does this only happen with your new patches/branch, or does it already happen in current master? Looking at your patches, I don't see anything wrong with how msgb's are allocated and free'd -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
