Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 02:11:49PM +0200, Andreas Eversberg wrote:
>
>
>> + lc = &trx->ts[0].lchan[4].lapdm_ch;
>> + if (!lc) {
>>
> how can this ever be null?
>
lc was a return vale from a function before, but you are right. this
check is now obsolete, so i removed it.thanx!
