On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 01:35:46PM +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote: Alexander,
> May be it's just me, but I find it impolite to ask someone to test a > patch, just because you don't bother to test it yourself. Moreover > when there it no a unit-test for the change - at least to make sure > that the next_rp_ref doesn't overflow. next_rp_ref and the message reference are of the same range. So it is intended to overlflow and I skipped the % UINT8_MAX. > We would be happy to test the patch in production environment, once > it's at least initially tested and merged to mainline. So far we're > busy with our own set of issues to be fixed, which are more severe > than this one. Patches to be contributed soon. In German we say "lieber den spatz in der hand, als die taube auf dem dach". We prepfer a little spaze over promises. I have seen your marketing about the contributions of Fairwaves, I have seen the promises of fixes coming. I just thought I could motivate you guys to actually fix something easy. I was wrong and there is no point in replying to this email. ;) holger
