18 февр. 2014 г. 11:02 пользователь "Holger Hans Peter Freyther" < [email protected]> написал: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:50:42PM +0400, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote: > > Good Morning, > > > + llist_for_each_entry(cur_trx, &trx->bts->trx_list, list) { > > + if (cur_trx->arfcn == arfcn) { > > I wondered if we want to compare the access reference as well? We do not > enforce that the ARFCNs of a TRX are distinct.
Actually I think we should rather start enforcing that. Or do you know situations when both TRX's could run on the same ARFCN? > And besides that I would > like you to move the look-up code to a separate function. That way we can > at least write a unit test in the future. +1 Please excuse typos. Written with a touchscreen keyboard. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris CEO/Founder Fairwaves LLC http://fairwaves.ru
