On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 11:45:17AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > [Despite today being April 1st, this is not an april fool's joke] > nice here and there, but maybe something like 100, 120 or even 130 might
It sounds to me like most opinions converge around 120. The collected opinions from this thread: "My terminal is generally 120 -140 characters wide. I also use Sublime Text which usually displays 110 the way I have it." "github site handles 120 chars fine" "I can fit 119" "A post some time last year pointed at a ruleset using 120." "120 is a good number." "I'm fine with either 100 or 120." "The 120 would be a dream come true" "I feel very uncomfortable with changing the coding style." and "the new policy should have a historical background too. I would suggest to use 132 columns (DECwriter II)" If we were a democracy the vote would be 120, but more African would be to reach unanimous agreement: would anyone like to comment on / veto the choice of changing the maximum permitted line width to 120 in the Osmocom projects? ~N
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
