From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <[email protected]>

In case of a ho_chan_activ_nack (sent due another bug inside
both sysmobts and openbsc) the code would not stop the timer
but free the datastructure. This can lead to a clear segfault
when the timer has expired. Create a "free" function which is
responsible to detach the handover structure, stop the timer
(which is idempotent) and free the structure.
---
 openbsc/src/libbsc/handover_logic.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/openbsc/src/libbsc/handover_logic.c 
b/openbsc/src/libbsc/handover_logic.c
index 22f9883..9284f7e 100644
--- a/openbsc/src/libbsc/handover_logic.c
+++ b/openbsc/src/libbsc/handover_logic.c
@@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ struct bsc_handover {

 static LLIST_HEAD(bsc_handovers);

+static void handover_free(struct bsc_handover *ho)
+{
+       osmo_timer_del(&ho->T3103);
+       llist_del(&ho->list);
+       talloc_free(ho);
+}
+
 static struct bsc_handover *bsc_ho_by_new_lchan(struct gsm_lchan *new_lchan)
 {
        struct bsc_handover *ho;
@@ -169,9 +176,7 @@ void bsc_clear_handover(struct gsm_subscriber_connection 
*conn, int free_lchan)
        if (free_lchan)
                lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, 0, RSL_REL_LOCAL_END);

-       osmo_timer_del(&ho->T3103);
-       llist_del(&ho->list);
-       talloc_free(ho);
+       handover_free(ho);
 }

 /* T3103 expired: Handover has failed without HO COMPLETE or HO FAIL */
@@ -186,8 +191,7 @@ static void ho_T3103_cb(void *_ho)
        ho->new_lchan->conn->ho_lchan = NULL;
        ho->new_lchan->conn = NULL;
        lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, 0, RSL_REL_LOCAL_END);
-       llist_del(&ho->list);
-       talloc_free(ho);
+       handover_free(ho);
 }

 /* RSL has acknowledged activation of the new lchan */
@@ -234,8 +238,7 @@ static int ho_chan_activ_nack(struct gsm_lchan *new_lchan)

        new_lchan->conn->ho_lchan = NULL;
        new_lchan->conn = NULL;
-       llist_del(&ho->list);
-       talloc_free(ho);
+       handover_free(ho);

        /* FIXME: maybe we should try to allocate a new LCHAN here? */

@@ -282,9 +285,7 @@ static int ho_gsm48_ho_compl(struct gsm_lchan *new_lchan)
        rsl_lchan_set_state(ho->old_lchan, LCHAN_S_INACTIVE);
        lchan_release(ho->old_lchan, 0, RSL_REL_LOCAL_END);

-       llist_del(&ho->list);
-       talloc_free(ho);
-
+       handover_free(ho);
        return 0;
 }

@@ -293,6 +294,7 @@ static int ho_gsm48_ho_fail(struct gsm_lchan *old_lchan)
 {
        struct gsm_network *net = old_lchan->ts->trx->bts->network;
        struct bsc_handover *ho;
+       struct gsm_lchan *new_lchan;

        ho = bsc_ho_by_old_lchan(old_lchan);
        if (!ho) {
@@ -302,15 +304,15 @@ static int ho_gsm48_ho_fail(struct gsm_lchan *old_lchan)

        osmo_counter_inc(net->stats.handover.failed);

-       osmo_timer_del(&ho->T3103);
-       llist_del(&ho->list);
+       new_lchan = ho->new_lchan;

        /* release the channel and forget about it */
        ho->new_lchan->conn->ho_lchan = NULL;
        ho->new_lchan->conn = NULL;
-       lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, 0, RSL_REL_LOCAL_END);
+       handover_free(ho);
+
+       lchan_release(new_lchan, 0, RSL_REL_LOCAL_END);

-       talloc_free(ho);

        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.1.3

Reply via email to