>> Strictly speaking, it speeds up lower parts of osmo-bts.
>>
>> And yes, it's a great improvement and I hope the review can be
>> finished and patch merged. Viterbi is the most CPU hungry part of
>> osmo-bts on UmTRX and other SDR platforms.
>
> then please find some time to review/include it. I can set barriers like
> (requires a testcase, ABI/API changes need a TODO-RELEASE entry)
> but I would like the people that end up using these routines to comment
> and review them.

Yeah, it's my bad ...

But I'm travelling for the next 10 days so won't happen immediately.

I'll at least try to re-read the discussion to see exactly what needs
to be done to get to a state where it can be merged even if it's not
perfect.

Cheers,

  Sylvain

Reply via email to