> On 24 Jun 2015, at 00:27, Alexander Chemeris <[email protected]> > wrote:
Dear Alexander, > Please note that the current behavior of this command is that it > already applies the change immediately by setting bts->ms_max_power. > This value is then used at rsl_rx_chan_rqd() to initialize > lchan->ms_power. But it does not apply it to SIs sent by the same BTS, > which makes the effect of the command inconsistent. The commit I > suggest just makes the behavior of the command consistent. we have completed the circle now and I don’t want to run another round. The ms_max_power aspect is annoying but it shows that we need to progress and look at the bigger picture. Are you willing to do that? holger
