On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:24:17PM +0200, ☎ wrote: > Having readily available protocol implementation as part of some > library would make it a lot easier to implement. It'll also make > protocol version tracking much simpler.
from my point of view there is nothing as a plain 'protocol implementation', but you would basically have to invent portable/stable data structures, associated APIs, etc. Given that MNCC is not complex but rather simply a way of encoding primitives that get shoved left and right, I'm not sure what such 'yet another representation for the MNCC primitives' would bring, except more code that needs to be written, and that needs to be traversed.
