> On 06 Apr 2016, at 17:20, Max <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> was your approach more simple?
>>
> Yes - instead of trying to re-create directory structure (which would
> make test runner unnecessary complex) I simply copy necessary additional
> configs explicitly. Using extension other than .cfg makes sure that they
> won't be copied (this one is recursive already btw) by config tester.
yes, but the code seems to be more involved than:
shutil.copytree
Can't we simplify the code by using this routine instead of having an extra
list of files to copy?
