> From: Neels Hofmeyr [mailto:[email protected]]

> I remember correctly, but preferably use the pchan type
> TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH in your osmo-bsc or osmo-nitb config.

As per the channel configuration defined in the code TCH/F_PDCH is a valid 
channel configuration and it should work as TCH/F or PDCH channel dynamically.
I tested even with TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH and it works fine only as TCH/H or PDCH it 
does not get used as TCH/F.

> When you refer to a PS call, do you mean that GPRS service is used to place a
> VoIP call? This is the same as saying that GPRS is functional.

By PS call I mean GPRS data transfer and yes GPRS is functional.
 
> Please verify your statements and/or accompany with log output, and also
> try TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH instead.

I have tested TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH also and it works fine as TCH/H channel. As per 
the name of the pchan type it can be used as TCH/F or TCH/H or PDCH 
But it does not work as TCH/F. 
Also as I mentioned earlier in TCH/F_PDCH pchan type CS (voice) call does not 
work.

> If the problem persists, please a) bisect to pinpoint the failing revision and
> b) add full log output, preferably with DRSL and DNM logs set to debug level.

Currently I am busy in other activities. I will bisect and capture the logs 
once I have some time . Could you please suggest any specific  Unit test case 
which can be 
executed to compare result.

Reply via email to