On 25/02/2017 17:55, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 05:26:28PM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: >> Hi Keith, >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 05:12:02PM +0100, Keith wrote: >>> Was it unfortunately never merged back to master because >>> Simply no one ever made the effort to do so. >> correct. > And let me add that it would also need an effort to duly test it. I'm very happy to put that effort in. The effort required for me to test (using test BTSs and phones in the lab as well as coordinated real world deployment tests) is minimal compared to moving the code into the master branch and writing tests as in "make test" for it. :-)
- Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 2050 Keith
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 2050 Keith
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 2050 Harald Welte
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 20... Harald Welte
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBT... Harald Welte
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBT... Harald Welte
- Re: Handover and load balancing on Sys... Neels Hofmeyr
- Re: Handover and load balancing o... Keith
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 20... Alexander Chemeris
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBT... Keith
- Re: Handover and load balancing on Sys... Harald Welte
- Re: Handover and load balancing on Sys... Alexander Chemeris
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 20... Harald Welte
- Re: Handover and load balancing on SysmoBTS 20... Keith
