On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:12:04AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > No, this looks wrong. Why are we inventing new VTY configuration for > anything below the SCCP protocol layer? This is all already present in > libosmo-sigtran?
Argh, missed this one. I now see that there are VTY commands for local and remote IPs, we'll take looks. ~N
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
