> On 18. Jul 2017, at 12:05, Harald Welte <[email protected]> wrote: >
Hey! > I completely understand that there is a point to having a policy that > can be configured at the BSC to restrict its supported codecs for > whatever local policy/configuration reason. This makes complete sense. > > I however don't understand why we should enforce that this policy does > not include both a restriction for which codecs to use on TCH/H and also > which codecs to use on TCH/F. It was just the easiest path forward. The customer that paid for the development of the BSC didn't have a mixed TCH/H and TCH/F network, we didn't have much tools to verify these things and it greatly reduced the effort to test it (as I think all untested code is likely to be broken). Looking at bssmap_handle_assignm_req we would support a mixed hr/fr list right now. holger
