HI, My name is Goran, I have femto cell would like test osmo iuh. Installed libosmocore on debian server, but got lot of problems with osmo IuH compiling. Curenlty I am stucked with osmo-sccp library. Also tried Vagrant IuH image, but there is issue with permisions, Is there a way to get some help for solving this issues, Thanks Goran
-----Original Message----- From: OpenBSC [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 4:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: OpenBSC Digest, Vol 35, Issue 30 Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: branches in openbsc.git (Harald Welte) 2. Re: randomness of identifiers (Harald Welte) 3. Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki (Harald Welte) 4. Re: ctrl interface: GET a variable with parameter (Harald Welte) 5. Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki (Kathryn Heckman) 6. Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki (Mychaela Falconia) 7. Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki (Tomcs?nyi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:05:09 +0800 From: Harald Welte <[email protected]> To: Neels Hofmeyr <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: branches in openbsc.git Message-ID: <20170927230509.pw4xug7jntrfvts2@nataraja> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:22:31AM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > another call for anyone aware of important branches on openbsc.git to > please name them, so that they can be migrated to the new repositories. > But foremost, please name them, thanks! >From "my" branches, I can see the following: * laforge/bssgp_fc -> osmo-sgsn * laforge/gprs-suspend -> osmo-bsc * laforge/power_control -> osmo-bsc -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:15:01 +0800 From: Harald Welte <[email protected]> To: Neels Hofmeyr <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: randomness of identifiers Message-ID: <20170927231501.zyqrali3onodi4iw@nataraja> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Neels, On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 07:57:43PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > > For TMSI allocation, my "cryptographic gut feeling"[tm] is that > > something like rand() or any other pseudo-random generator of > > significantly large period is sufficient *if* it is seeded by a > > non-predictable value. So something like seeding with getrandom() result > > should be fine? > Might also make sense to periodically re-seed from /dev/urandom / > getrandom(), like every 100 TMSIs, or based on a timeout might be > easier to implement. I would try to avoid any predictability here. Having a fixed time interval would be known to an attackers. So if he was somehow able to reduce/exhaust the entropy at the known time for re-seeding, it would be bad. Similar for "every 100 TMSIs", which is something under control of any attacker as he can control the number of location updates via the public radio interface [to some extent] and thus control the time at whcih re-seeding is done. Maybe I'm going overboard here, but I think if you want to re-seed, you want to ideally do it at a non-predictable and non-controllable point in time. Like a random time interval ;) > > For long-term stable key (Ki/Op) generation for provisioning SIM > > cards + populating a HLR, I would certainly opt for using stronger > > randomness sources. However, I don't think we actually implement > > that anywhere, do we? > > what does openssh use for public/private keypair generation? I'm not sure you can compare the requirements for generation of RSA public/private keys with those for generation of symmetric keys. You can find different recommendations in the literature. But I guess that's mainly due to the fact that people usually assume you have long-term stable public/private keys and short-lived symmetric session keys. In our case, it's long-lived symmetric keys. But as indicated, I think our focus is to find a proper solution for generation of TMSIs and for random numbers used in authentication challenges. K/OPc pair generation is not supported in current Osmocom tools anyway, as we presume the SIM cards already have sufficiently random key material and those keys are entered into the HLR. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 06:52:28 +0800 From: Harald Welte <[email protected]> To: Kathryn Heckman <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki Message-ID: <20170927225228.u4udbuhk2fyebrl5@nataraja> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Kathryn, On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:37:36PM -0400, Kathryn Heckman wrote: > Is there any way to retrieve the value of OP from OPc and Ki? No, that defeats the entire purpose of having card-individual OPc values. If you could just revert that operation, there would be no [security] advantage of card-individual OPc values over a global OP value, and hence that entire option could be dropped from the specifications altogether. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 06:50:03 +0800 From: Harald Welte <[email protected]> To: Neels Hofmeyr <[email protected]> Cc: Holger Freyther <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: ctrl interface: GET a variable with parameter Message-ID: <20170927225003.ix4qgulake4gugyu@nataraja> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Neels, On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:27:38PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > Also we do have a concept of nesting CTRL nodes separated by dots in > the variable name, looking at bsc_ctrl_node_lookup() and > fsm_ctrl_node_lookup(). correct. > I notice though that we do still have open doors for a lot of nonsense > being sent to it without proper validation or error messages. > > GET 42 existing-variable.trailing.names.ignored more nonsense > following being ignored > > in effect is identical to: > > GET 42 existing-variable > > So we should probably enforce that there is no ignored nonsense... I agree. > Should we also enforce a numeric command ID? I'm not following here. Where would that numeric command ID comning from? > GET currently-any-id-is-possible-even-\t-\n-is-accepted my-command this is also not intended, I'm quite sure. > Going back to the OsmoHLR CTRL commands -- they are implemented in a > way that doesn't match the CTRL interface ways. Let's collapse them. > > SET enable-ps <IMSI> > SET disable-ps <IMSI> > SET status-ps <IMSI> indeed, this is not proper. > SET subscriber.by-imsi.123456789098765.ps-enabled 1 > SET subscriber.by-imsi.123456789098765.ps-enabled 0 > GET subscriber.by-imsi.123456789098765.ps-enabled makes a lot of sense to me. > We can also expand this later to things like > > GET subscriber.by-imsi.123456789098765.status > SET subscriber.by-imsi.123456789098765.msisdn 2345 > GET subscriber.by-msisdn.2342.status > SET subscriber.by-msisdn.2342.ps-enabled 0 > GET subscriber.by-imei.987654321234565.imsi looks good! > We could leave the enable-ps, disable-ps, status-ps commands in place > in case anyone is using it yet. I assume no-one is though. I don't think we need to keep compatibility at this point. -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170928/d568b5f9/attachment-0001.bin> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:46:27 -0400 From: Kathryn Heckman <[email protected]> To: Harald Welte <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki Message-ID: <CAHmN-qT=5x=5xznwhjybsbyw2zjpwtcrmiwhu3iwxdysbqt...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I really appreciate your quick replies. I have a USIM that I wanted to program. However, I am getting the runtime error for exceeding the number of attempts to enter the ADM1 key. Is there any fix for it? -- Kathryn On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Harald Welte <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kathryn, > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:37:36PM -0400, Kathryn Heckman wrote: > > Is there any way to retrieve the value of OP from OPc and Ki? > > No, that defeats the entire purpose of having card-individual OPc > values. > > If you could just revert that operation, there would be no [security] > advantage of card-individual OPc values over a global OP value, and > hence that entire option could be dropped from the specifications > altogether. > > Regards, > Harald > -- > - Harald Welte <[email protected]> > http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > ============================================================ > ================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. > A6) > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170927/620a2963/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:04:35 -0800 From: Mychaela Falconia <[email protected]> To: Kathryn Heckman <[email protected]> Cc: openbsc <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki Message-ID: <CA+uuBqbtTfsrADC-ENCfGt2RY=XYUYN0d466=zr3mrn_up-...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 9/27/17, Kathryn Heckman <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a USIM that I wanted to program. However, I am getting the > runtime error for exceeding the number of attempts to enter the ADM1 > key. Is there any fix for it? Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I would assume that having exceeded the number of attempts to enter the ADM1 key means that the USIM is bricked beyond recovery. But the sysmoUSIM cards sold at shop.sysmocom.de are fairly inexpensive for a pack of 10, so a bricked (U)SIM shouldn't be too big of a tragedy - or is there another dimension to this problem which I am missing? If you are anywhere near local to me (California, USA) I could give you one of my sysmoUSIM cards, but I am guessing it probably won't help you as I bought the cheaper version without the ADM1 keys - for my application (production testing of my GSM MS hardware) it doesn't matter what the programming of the (U)SIM happens to be. M~ ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:35:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Tomcs?nyi, Domonkos <[email protected]> To: Mychaela Falconia <[email protected]> Cc: Kathryn Heckman <[email protected]>, openbsc <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Retrieve OP from OPc and Ki Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Kathryn and Mychaela, 2017. szept. 28. d?tummal, 4:04 id?pontban Mychaela Falconia <[email protected]> ?rta: > Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I would assume that > having exceeded the number of attempts to enter the ADM1 key means > that the USIM is bricked beyond recovery. This is my understanding as well. Cheers, Domi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170928/c99fe291/attachment.html> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ OpenBSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc ------------------------------ End of OpenBSC Digest, Vol 35, Issue 30 *************************************** The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. The person who receives this message and who is not the addressee, one of his employees or an agent entitled to hand it over to the addressee, is informed that he may not use, disclose or reproduce the contents thereof, and is kindly asked to notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately.
