Dear Vadim, just FYI, the jolly branch stuck and cannot sync to BTS on my side. I was using Sylvain branch for the test.
Thanks. DUO On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Sandi Suhendro <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, > Thanks alot Vadim. :-) will try to debug and will keep report. > > Thanks. > DUO > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Vadim Yanitskiy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Let's keep the public conversation, >> there are no secrets, right? ;) >> >> > Here is the pcap attached and here is the osmo-nitb >> > log https://pastebin.com/NJa0YU08 >> > >> > here is the osmo-bts log https://pastebin.com/RZ0au5yA >> > >> > hope you know what is wrong. Thanks >> >> Have a look at the following log lines: >> >> > trx_if.c:217 Enqueuing TRX control command 'CMD NOHANDOVER 0 0' >> > ... >> > trx_if.c:371 Response message: 'RSP NOHANDOVER -1' >> > trx_if.c:403 transceiver (phy0.0) rejected TRX command >> > with response: 'RSP NOHANDOVER -1' >> > bts.c:208 Shutting down BTS 0, Reason TRX-CTRL-MSG: CRITICAL >> >> For some reason, the OsmocomBB transceiver rejects the command. >> Despite it's implemented and should work as expected. >> >> Let's look at the source code (trx.c:400 _trx_ctrl_cmd_(no)handover): >> >> > int n, tn, ss = 0; >> > >> > n = sscanf(args, "%d %d", &tn, &ss); >> > >> > if ((n < 1) || (tn < 0) || (tn > 7) || (ss < 0) || ((ss > 8))) >> > return _trx_ctrl_send_resp(trx, cmd, "%d %d %d", -1, tn, ss); >> > >> > // ... >> >> Try to debug this condition on your side. >> I cannot reproduce your problem... >> >> With best regards, >> Vadim Yanitskiy. >> >> > > > > -- best regards, Krazy Sandi Blue Soho Recordings Number One Recordings
