Unfortunately I have no info about new development, only speculation from the site being archived and things heard thirdhand about people getting reassigned with no details. I should be more conservative/specific when putting assertions onto public mailing lists : )
Kurtis is right, that CCM was never officially brought into TIP, and was just a Facebook incubated project too. There are a couple of us using CCM in the community, but we haven’t had the time or resources to do much work on it over the last few months. People are open do doing code review and accepting patches on the co-cell/ccm repo, but facebookincubator/CommunityCellularManager has been officially archived with no plan for future work. -Matt J. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 14:41 Kurtis Heimerl <[email protected]> wrote: > Some clarifications: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 1:06 PM Harald Welte <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Matthew, >> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:51:32AM -0700, Matthew Johnson wrote: >> > to public voip network communication. The project was originally run by >> the >> > Telecom Infra Project, but was abandoned by them last year >> >> It's sad to hear that it has been officially abandoned :( >> >> It was more or less apparent to me that priorities had somewhat >> changed/shifted >> and that none of the more or less expected steps (like porting it to the >> post-NITB osmocom stack) have happened. >> > > Couple clarifications, CCM was never part of TIP and was instead an FB > project. Abandoned is also maybe the wrong term; internal development at FB > ended and development was transferred out of the company. There isn't a lot > of activity now though, aside from the ongoing deployments. > > >> >> > after they moved to a new (unfortunately private) internal tool >> >> This is the first time I'm hearing about some private internal tool that >> replaces CCM. Are you able to share more information about this? >> >> > As is the nature of private internal tools, no. It's not really a > replacement for CCM though, interests have moved in a different direction > (or had when I was still there). > > >> >> I've asked the OpenCellular project to clarify this in their forum, see >> >> http://ocforum.telecominfraproject.com/t/status-of-communitycellularmanager/86 >> >> Unfortunately the Forum doesn't [yet] seem to be very active. >> >> Regards, >> Harald >> >> -- >> - Harald Welte <[email protected]> >> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ >> >> ============================================================================ >> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." >> (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. >> A6) >> > > > -- > Public Key: https://flowcrypt.com/pub/[email protected] >
