Small Follow-up, before it gets too off-topic: On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 04:30:44PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Docker and other related entities have been ignoring this for years, > despite lots of voices raising this topic. See for example > https://lwn.net/Articles/752982/
Just yesterday there also is the following publication of the Linux Foundation on this topic: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2020/04/docker-containers-what-are-the-open-source-licensing-considerations/ Quote: > How do we collect and publish the required source code? > [...] > This is currently an unsolved problem. Seeing this seven years after the initial release of Docker clearly sends one message: They don't give a s**t about enabling their users to be able to follow open source license compliance. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
