On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:22:20PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> > > 1434 if (val < INT64_MIN) {
>
> Wouldn't they go away with a simple change from INT64_MIN/MAX to
> LLONG_MIN/MAX?
I want to specifically use INT64_MIN to check whether the long long value,
which theoretically might be higher range than int64_t, surpasses int64_t
range.
It also wouldn't go away, because a 64 bit signed int val can never be smaller
than INT64_MIN. I'm aware of that, but still want to have that check there for
I guess autistic obsessive perfectionism, just in case long long gets longer.
