On 2009-04-18, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:27:46PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2009-03-14, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I haven't been able to get lbdbq to work or even run lbdbq or lbdb-munge. >> >> this is a port bug. if the bash shell is installed at package build time, >> the resulting package also requires bash to be installed. "pkg_add bash" >> will help you for now, and i've just fixed the port so it won't happen >> for packages built in the future. >> > Stuart, I don't know if this will help, but on two systems that > I have lbdb installed, I have also had to install gawk. Once bash > and gawk were installed, lbdbq worked.
It does, thanks for the report - I've just fixed it in the port. Somebody went a bit over the top with the use of autoconf in lbdb. Most port maintainers (well, the non-slack ones anyway..!) would like to hear if people have a problem using their ports or the packages produced by them; pkg_info <portname> shows who to get in touch with. _______________________________________________ Openbsd-newbies mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
