Robert Joop wrote:
> i'm not very happy with your linux-specific scripts (calling /bin/bash,
> which has yet to become standard on unix OSes) and your interactive
> makefiles.
>
> what do you think about converting to autoconf and letting it do the
> substitutions?
I was thinking about it, when I'll have some time I will make an autoconf
file having the main Makefile with the right subst.
> well, openca contains a collection of perl modules, too, where perl'ing
> Makefile.PL is the standard way to configure... i'm not sure whether
> and how both should be combined, or whether everything should be done
> via MakeMaker.
> (currently, you are even using autoconf for a perl module (OpenCA-SV).)
The OpenCA-SV module is acutally a C program (sv/sign/verify) so the autoconf
was needed. I am not an expert in Autoconf so if someone wants to voloteer...
--
C'you,
Massimiliano Pala
--o-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openca.org Tel.: +39 (0)59 270 094
http://openca.sourceforge.net Mobile: +39 (0)347 7222 365
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
