Robert Joop wrote:
>
> On 01-10-26 10:57:25 CEST, Michael Bell wrote:
> > The actual plan is:
> >
> > src/
> > servers/
> > ca/
> > ra/
> > public/ or pub/
> > ocsp/
>
> i feel there is a conflict on the meta level.
> ocsp (and e.g. ldap) are protocols, ca, ra and pub are not, they are
> configuration instances of (an) http server(s).
ocspd/ should have been used.
> why not
> servers/
[...]
> ldap/ (where's that hidden currently?)
ldap is to be added, I guess.
> > data-exchange/
> > database/ (if DBM is used)
>
> what do you mean by this comment?
> what do you want to put in this *source* directory?
I agree with you. There is no need to actually have this dir into the src
structure.
>
> > openssl/
> > serial
> > index.txt
>
> why do we need this directory with these files?
> index.txt is initially empty and serial contains a single number, i.e.
> one echo and touch command in a makefile, respectively...
These can be removed as well. Makefiles will have to generate the
missing files.
> why not put data/'s contents into common/?
> the data structures are common, aren't they?
> perhaps
>
> data/data-exchange -> common/data/exchange
> data/database -> common/data/storage
> data/openssl -> common/data/storage/Makefile?
What is meant to be in common/data/storage ? This is to be removed, to me.
Also the data/openssl should be included in a contrib/ dir as this is tied
to the openssl directly, not openca.
--
C'you,
Massimiliano Pala
--o-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openca.org Tel.: +39 (0)59 270 094
http://openca.sourceforge.net Mobile: +39 (0)347 7222 365
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
