Bernd Rudack wrote:
Hi Developers,I'm responsible for the most problems. I tried to fix all the items on my ToDo-list and I don't want too many RCs. So you are right. We sould try to stabilize the RCs and go back to build snapshots and no pre-RCs. The other problem is that we want a flat CVS what is impossible for big projects.
I had a hard fight against several problems of OpenCA 0.9.1RC7 from beginning of November. With help of Michael I could solve most of them.
But then I found a new issue of the same release (0.9.1RC7). Iinstalled it and I was suprised to find a release with new features and a lot of modifications and in addition a lot of new problems and questions.
It would be great if you could start a new RC or sub revision if you add important features or functions. It is very hard to deal with a snapshot where old bugs are fixed but new are coming up.
I would propose the following:
- feature freeze for RC7
- integration of the dc-style in the configuration in 0.9.2 and not in 0.9.1
- RC7 release on 2002-Dec-20
- 0.9.1 release on 2003-Jan-01
Yes, this is a complete hacking stop. Only bugfixing and polishing is allowed for the next three weeks. What do you think about it?
Another important thing is release tagging. Are there recommended styles for such tags?
openca_0_9_1_RC7
Any comments?
Michael
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bell Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rechenzentrum - Datacenter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Humboldt-University of Berlin Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482
Unter den Linden 6 Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2959
10099 Berlin
Germany http://www.openca.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
