Oliver Welter wrote:
Hi Michael,
I think both suggestions are ok
perhaps we can offer two differen archives on the website - one full
blown and one stripped....
yes - i think this may be a good idea and its quite common
so ppl can decide what would be best fit for them
and for the distributions packages its also a good idea, since they just
put the needed perl-modules into the requirements and so get smaler packets
too for the pure openca stuff
but - since i still didn't get any answer at the core-list i just put it
here again:
i talked with the author of sscep to ask him for inclusion of his stuff into
openca-distribution for testing scep-protocol he didn't have a problem with
this and likes the idea...
and its small anyway - so it would be just there as an third-party support
and may help rise quality of our and his product ,o)
greetings
dalini
--
Ives Steglich Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administration Tel.: +49 (0)3677 - 69 4382/4383
Fax: +49 (0)3677 - 69 4399
Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technology
Langewiesener Strasse 22
98693 Ilmenau Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Germany http://www.openca.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
