Michael Bell wrote:

Yes, MySQL has a really own idea of indexes.

what do you mean by this? till now i didn't realized they would have quite a diffrent understanding of it...


The sequence stuff does not work too

you can simulate sequence stuff (with an own table or scripting, mysql has some abilities for scripting imho), otherweise, they have the ability to autoincrement numbered columns... which works normaly like a sequence...


and SQL statement concatenation with ";" as seperator does not

this is new, usaly this should work with mysql too...

work too. I commited the updated module 1 minute ago. Nevertheless it looks like MySQL is 25 % faster than PostgreSQL but I don't know anything about the transaction handling of my MySQL.

mysql is quite good speed optimized for simple queries thats why a lot of people use mysql instead of postgresql if they don't need the features (like subqueries, which didn't work for a long time), of postgresql or other full featured dbms, which are not included in mysql


greetings dalini


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel

Reply via email to