Hi all,
I am thinking about the next code cleanup. We mixed table/objecttype and state together and called it datatype. I would like to see clean interfaces and therefore I want to see two options for this. The question now is, can we agree on this issue and if yes how we should name the two options?
status/state objecttype/table/type/datatype
The reason in the background is that I want to reduce the unnecessary usage of regex. We really often use regex to parse and handle the datatype. This costs performance and sometimes it creates errors. I start thinking about this because I wan to update the DBI docs.
I would prefer datatype and state but this is only a feeling and no real reason. Today we can think about such changes because the migrated code base is really small.
Michael -- _______________________________________________________________
Michael Bell Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin
Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482 ZE Computer- und Medienservice Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2704 Unter den Linden 6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] D-10099 Berlin _______________________________________________________________
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
