Massimiliano Pala wrote:
Michael Bell wrote:
[...]

No, but it is important for me to know that there is something new on the production branch.

Well, it is not submitted in the CVS, I wanted to know what you think
about the changes to the OpenSSL Token before submitting...

If you tested the 0.9.2 version with and without the hardware token then you can commit but please write a notice to the developerlist because we have to verify that nCipher and Luna still work.

I see no problem with the patch of the OpenCA::OpenSSL module (I think you do not mean Token::OpenSSL). Until now every new HSM required some small changes in OpenCA::OpenSSL because every vendor use another detail of the OpenSSL engine interface. If ERACOM works then commit it, so that everyone can test it.

BTW can you add some small notices to guide/admin/token.xml or mail me the notes as normal text. A good documentation prevents a lot of questions.

Michael
--
_______________________________________________________________

Michael Bell                    Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin

Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482       ZE Computer- und Medienservice
Fax:  +49 (0)30-2093 2704       Unter den Linden 6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   D-10099 Berlin
_______________________________________________________________

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to