Hi Michael,
Only a notice for the people who don't read licenses, we cannot use the pure LGPL because it always talks about a library. So some more detailed discussion is required.Hmm ok after looking at gnu.org I think it is no problem just to state that we consider that "library" is equal to our product.
The other question for me is, should we perhaps change the license to the GPL ?
If I understand the GPL stuff correctly:LGPL means, someone can take OpenCA Code, create some enhancements around and sell it
GPL means, every modification you make to the code must go back to the project.
I think this is somewhat related to the question of taking money from EU fundings - if you choose GPL we might offer a "commercial" license for those who want to incorporate OpenCA in there own projects...
So what should we do ?? Oliver -- Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt Basiszertifikat: http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/page72
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
