eirc dai wrote:
> I notice that OCSPD do not support linux threading ( both linux 
> threading lib and NPTL).so how about its performance
> anotherway ,I also see below word in openssl.org about the openssl ocsp 
> process

The problem with OCSPD and threads is that some implementations of the
ENGINE interface we tested do not really support threading and have also
problems with dynamic forking of process. This is why the server has the
actual pre-forking structure.

[...]
> http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ocsp.html
>  
> maybe I ask a stupid question , has OCSPD  same issue as openssl OCSP 
> server?

No... the openssl implementation is not meant to be a server, whilst our
work provides a stand-alone daemon capable of processing requests quite
efficiently.

By using an HSM we could achieve >400 requests/second on a single processor
server (this on a 5 CAs configuration with 200k entries CRLs) - qualitative
measurement, though. While for software only implementation performance
drops to 40/50 reqs per second (signed responses).

I hope this clarifies the differences with the openssl implementation (we
still, anyway, use the openssl ocsp libs for basic crypto operations).

-- 

Best Regards,

        Massimiliano Pala

--o------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager]      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                Tel.:   +39 (0)11  564 7081
http://security.polito.it                       Fax:    +39   178  270 2077
                                                Mobile: +39 (0)347 7222 365

Politecnico di Torino (EuroPKI)
Certification Authority Informations:

Authority Access Point                                  http://ca.polito.it
Authority's Certificate:          http://ca.polito.it/ca_cert/en_index.html
Certificate Revocation List:              http://ca.polito.it/crl02/crl.crl
--o------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to