Lizner Martin wrote:
i guess the name does not matter - what really does matter is the
export/import logic - as i have only 30 certs in the test setup and the
export from ca -> ra and import ra <- ca operation are slow via
floppy.  and the tar has 700kB size already. so some scalability is
necessary.
Ok, the first steps are available via CVS. We track the exported objects. Actually we don't track the mails and the batchprocessor. The batch processor is not a problem because this is officially alpha - there is only one real user :)

The mails are a real problem. Today the serials of the mails are identical with the serials of the certificates. Perhaps we should copy the mails by loading all certs and then checking the mails by their serial numbers. The log-files would called MAIL_CRIN.log or MAIL_DEFAULT.log. The rest of the handling is identical with the normal objects.

Any comments?

Michael
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bell Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rechenzentrum - Datacenter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Humboldt-University of Berlin Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482
Unter den Linden 6 Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2959
10099 Berlin
Germany http://www.openca.org



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
_______________________________________________
Openca-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users


Reply via email to