Thank you Michael for such a pithy answer, it's a good news about InnoDB :o)
Unfortunately I'm not such a good programmer for changing the sources, so
I'll leave this for a trained peoples ;o).

I'm plan to go in production with OpenCA 0.9.2.2 in very short time and now
interested is it will be a big deal to upgrade after some time to next
generation branch, like 0.9.3. 

Regards,

Dmitrij


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Michael Bell
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Openca-Users] BDB vs myISAM & InnoDB
> 
> Hi Dimitrij,
> 
> Dmitrij Mironov wrote:
> 
> > Can somebody explain me why OpenCA uses BDB tables in mySQL 
> instead of 
> > myISAM or InnoDB? Is the BerkeleyDB has some special 
> features, witch 
> > is not possible to implement with myISAM or InnoDB?
> 
> The short answer is for historical reasons. The long answer 
> is that we will use in the future InnoDB (CVS HEAD) but we 
> cannot change this in the old branches like openca_0_9_2.
> 
> myISAM is no real alternative because of the poor transaction 
> support. 
> BDB and InnoDB has both a good transaction support. It looks 
> like InnoDB is today the better implementation. Nevertheless 
> BDB was the first compiled in and production ready solution. 
> Therefore I used BDB.
> 
> I do not want to change this in openca_0_9_2 to avoid any new 
> problems with the production release. If you want InnoDB then 
> you can change the sources without any problems.
> 
> I hope this answers your questions. If it is not enough then 
> please ask again. It is really rare that somebody takes a so 
> deep look into the details. The change to InnoDB was 
> motivated by exactly such a question ;)
> 
> Greetings Michael
> --
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Michael Bell                    Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin
> 
> Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482       ZE Computer- und Medienservice
> Fax:  +49 (0)30-2093 2704       Unter den Linden 6
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   D-10099 Berlin
> _______________________________________________________________
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to