Dear experts, Version 0.9.2.2, branch 0_9_2, and HEAD version all have a pair of files 1) configure and 2) configure.in in in the root directory of the distribution.
Is it correct that autoconf configure.in > configure.new should build "configure.new" identical to "configure" provided with the distribution? In all 3 version listed above this is not correct for me. "configure.new" differs from "configure" essentially though not very dramatically. I am using CNU autoconf-2.59 and FreeBSD-5.4. Which of the files (configure or configure.in) distributed should be considered as a primary one? In other words, which of them should be patched if I want to submit a patch? Thank you very much ahead of time, Sergei ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Openca-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users
