Hi Martin,

 Yes, you are right, I upgraded my machine to Fedora 21 that comes with
Firefox 24 and I can sign the request again.

Thanks,
Nuno

On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 12:06 +0100, Martin Hecht wrote:
> Hi Nuno,
> 
> maybe I have good news about this issue:
> 
> When Firefox 33 came out, I wasn't even able to sign the challenge in
> the web interfaces (which I have configured for login via certificate).
> In the meantime I was using Firefox 31 ESR and now that I have found
> some time and started to look into this issue it suddenly works again
> (at least to sign the challenge). I'm using "Mozilla Firefox 34.0 for
> Ubuntu canonical - 1.0" now together with OpenCa 1.5.1. So, maybe
> Mozilla or the team from Ubuntu who integrate it into the distribution
> have solved this problem in the meantime. Maybe you could try it in your
> environment?
> 
> Signing the requests didn't work in my setup anyway (I have separated
> the web-components on different hosts without a shared file system and
> signing the requests seems to use the files in addition to the database
> at some point - so I issue the certificates directly by logging into the
> Ca interface with my operator certificate). I would have to set up a
> separate test environment to verify exactly your scenario, but I could
> do so if I find the time between the years.
> 
> best regards,
> Martin
> 
> On 11/06/2014 04:23 PM, Nuno Dias wrote:
> >  Hi Martin,
> >
> >  Yes, although is not a solution, Firefox 31 can sign the requests, in
> > Opera I can't even load a certificate :(
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nuno
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:45 +0100, Martin Hecht wrote:
> >> Hi Nuno,
> >>
> >> I haven't a solution yet, but a workaround could be to use the Extended
> >> Support Release 31 of Firefox which still works with this  signing
> >> procedure. It is available here: ​
> >> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/all.html and
> >> presumably gets updates until summer 2015.
> >>
> >> Alternatively, a colleague just mentioned Opera 12 which works according
> >> to him...
> >>
> >> best regards,
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> On 11/05/2014 06:32 PM, Nuno Dias wrote:
> >>>  Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>  Since the last update of firefox (33) I can't sign certificates
> >>> requests, the openca version is 1.1.1, and I get this error in the
> >>> console of firefox
> >>>
> >>> "Netscape" signForm.js:4
> >>> "crypto supported on firefox!" signForm.js:6
> >>> TypeError: theWindow.crypto.signText is not a function signForm.js:54
> >>> "Netscape" signForm.js:4
> >>> "crypto supported on firefox!"
> >>>
> >>> I saw the code of the last version of openca (1.5.0) and the signForm.js
> >>> has the same call, anyone can advise a solution to this problem?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Nuno
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Openca-Users mailing list
> Openca-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users

-- 
Nuno Dias <nd...@lip.pt>
LIP

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Openca-Users mailing list
Openca-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users

Reply via email to