Hi Tom,
first, "pong" !
it's just a (bad) comparison: a Litronic 210 used with IBM PC/SC driver
under W98 lets the CPU utilization indicator under 10%.
if you're sure that most of the resources are used by ""OCF"" (meaning that
this "CPU indicator" is a very poor figure) you can try to use a PC/SC
driver, an other VM (which one are you using?), and finally look for
infinite loop in your code ,-)
concerning 1.1 -> 1.2 migration, most of the deprecated methods are
available, you should so be able to have your code running with the new
library. the most difference seems to be the event model, since the old one
is supported it's not a problem; i can't give you more details i have
(actually) started using OCF with 1.2 ... the event model of which can IMHO
again be enhanced.
concerning your "All-in-One" concern ... give it a try, it seems matching
what it's suggest.
cheers,
Sylvain.
At 14:33 24/02/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm running OCF with the Litronic 210 native driver on Windows 2000. I
>noticed that when the machine and smartcard are idle, the CPU utilization is
>at 95% or so...
>Any ideas about this?
>
>This seems a bit crazy.
>
>Tom McKearney
---
> Visit the OpenCard web site at http://www.opencard.org/ for more
> information on OpenCard---binaries, source code, documents.
> This list is being archived at http://www.opencard.org/archive/opencard/
! To unsubscribe from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list send an email
! to
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! containing the word
! unsubscribe
! in the body.
