(this accidentally went to Andre, so here it is again)
>> http://www.opencard.org/
>>
>> Seems IBM likes the name as much as we do. I think we need a new name...
>
>We do, but we might as well stick with this. I fear if we change names now
>somebody else will rip us off. So let's keep our final name a big secret,
>so that even we don't know what it is. ;-)
I agree with Andre on this:
We can stick to OpenCard now, until we have something to show. Then we can
pick up the discussion about names again, but we shouldn't argue about the
name *now* like amateurs!
It's like with photoshop, where one beta had the working name "Tiger
Mountain". Surely not a name they'd sell it under, right? Besides that,
HyperCard's name (which I like so much that I can't help mentioning it
again) when it was being worked on was "WildCard". See, nobody starts with
the final name.
Now, back to that UI issue, the interpreter and the block file ...
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
