> <<I think perhaps some people on this group would like to keep the
> syntax
> 100% compatible with HyperTalk. I personally think we should create a
> new
> language that is faster to write code in.>>
>
> MP0werd : I want hypertalk PERIOD.
Alain : I believe that HyperTalk will be a SUB-set of the scripting
language that we will devise. Full compatibility with HyperTalk is
indeed desirable.
> MP0werd : It's always nice to have new features though, like the
> ability to use multiple processors, multiple processes, classes, being
> able to do: VAR=4+var2 instead of PUT 4+var2 INTO VAR, etc...
Alain : We do not want to merely clone HyperCard. Hindsight being 20 /
20, we should engineer something that, while maintaining compatibility
with HyperCard, will be even better than the original. No arguments
here, eh !
