> Rob Cozens : I can't describe a specific case off the top of my head,
> but I recall more than one occasion when it seemed to me what I wanted
> to accomplish in HyperTalk could have best been implemented by adding
> new commands/syntax to the interpreter itself rather than MickeyMouse
> an Xthing or "do".
Alain : So true. That is why I think there should be some close ties
between the UFP and OpenCard collaborations. UFPers could suggest new
syntax ideas to the OpenCard group, for example.
> Rob Cozens : Is it possible to design a scripting platform that
> incorporates the ability to add new capabilities to the interpreter
> itself?
Alain : I couldn't say whether it is possible or advisable for
scripters to add new capabilities to the interpreter itself. The jury is
not out on this one yet.
Alain : We will probably start with a "suggestion box" kind of deal
where UFPers can suggest new syntax additions to the OpenCarders. By
merging somewhat both of these collaborations, perhaps we could
collectively vote on new syntax propositions, instead of leaving up to
the OpenCarders only.
