I've found the PPC bug (it was a @!#@!!@* missing 'break' statement). However, the 68K bug is still anyone's guess.. BTW: It seems the compiler was correct when it generated a recursive function cal... but I'm hiding that under the rug. But I still stand by by comments about the OS. PS: IS ANYONE READING THIS?!
- Re: OODL: Interpreter Status Report of 6/26/99 DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Interpreter Status Report of 6/26/99 M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Interpreter Status Report of 6/26/99 MP0werd
