>No, I'm just commenting that if the graphics are to be of limited use, they
>must also be allowe to be used in documentation.
The documentation needs to be declared to be a part of OpenCard (which it
is, anyway). As the license for external media restricts use of those to
OpenCard-related things, documentation would be allowed to use them. Of
course, reviews would also be allowed to.
>I don't, for the record, think that limited use is a good idea. I'd like
>the Interpreter to be integrated into other things.
No problem. The graphics would only be restricted for use with OC. Of
course, we could allow the creator to give her graphics to OpenCard under
the OC external media license and still distribute them under another
license (be it FreeWare or commercial, we don't care) herself. That is, the
creator just gives us the non-limited rights to use her graphics under the
OC media License, while anything non-OC remains her business.
>I think we could argue that point.
I could also argue -- I think we should allow resale. We may gain from
this like the PC platform benefited from the cloning business.
>>Anthony : PS -- Watch out -- ResCraft is alive, again.
>>Alain : What does ResCraft do ? Why should we watch out for it ?
>Only Uli should :) He knows <eg>
BTW, Anthony, we still need to come up with the Fireball (or what'd we name
it?) protocol for Resurrection/ResCraft, don't we?
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
