>I am in favor of building an OpenTalk interpreter like an
>embedded Metacard product and putting it under the
>LGPL.
>(...)
Well, I don't claim I grok the law stuff, but if the other's think this'll
work, I'm with you.
I've re-read Anthony's summary and have a few questions:
1) Can binaries be distributed under the LGPL w/o including the sources
(with sources being available upon request)?
2) What about this clause that we have to allow re-linking of our code and
library code; can I have the object file of our code in above "upon
request" shipment?
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
