>At 9:25 AM -0400 on 7/21/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Your rule should be, anyone can fork the source and call it something
>>different, but it has to end with -Card. Like OtherCard, AlterCard,
>>Differencard, etc. Someone wants better color support and they write
>>ColorCard; someone else really likes ColorCard but wants better transparency
>>support so they write TranslucentCard.
>
>But why force them all to be named /.*-Card/? It'd increase name confusion,
>if anything.
I agree. Naming them all *Card isn't that good. Let them use any name they
choose. We might recommend some naming convention, though, to indicate this
comes from the OpenCard tree, but we shouldn't require it. No harm in
nudging people in the direction we want them to go, but if we force them to
think our way they'll jump the boat.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
