At 11:27 AM +1100 on 7/27/99, spierings wrote:
>> DEFINITIONS:
>>
>> LICENCE shall mean an OpenSource licence which allows:
>> 1) Any person to combine the licenced product with anything
>> else and release the resulting derived product so long as
>> they:
>> a) Release it under a different name; and
>> b) Give credit
>
>Do we really need credit? I don't like this. Forks should not have to give us
>credit. They can do so voluntarily of coarse.
I'll change that.
>
>> 2) Any person may fork. Conditions for forking shall be the
>> same as 1.
>> LICENCE shall be perpetual, non-exlcusive, and irrevocable.
>>
>> OPENCARD shall mean a certain product being created by OODL in order
>> to replace HyperCard.
>
>Change the word "replace". We are not replacing anything.
Will do.
>
>> MAINTAINER shall mean the person in charge of OpenCard. His word
>>shall
>> be the Last Word (except for forking). He shall be chosen
>> a specified below.
>
>I don't want one person to be able to make decisions for our product. I'm
>*very*
>against having a leader at this/any stage. We have been working well as an
>anarchy so far. Why change?
True. That's just for later, when we have to start worrying about "official
releases" and such.
