At 3:28 PM +0100 on 11/25/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>Anthony,
>
> I think adding direct access to pixel values this way is a rather big
>addition to OC. If we really wanted it, I'd say we extend graphic objects
>to support this natively. That is, there are properties like "the depth of
>pixel map 5", and you would do chunk expressions on graphics to edit the
>data, that is "put 32767,32767,32767 into pixel 5 of grc 7". OC would do
>the calculations needed depending on the pixel depth etc. But for starters
>we should stick to the image-editing facilities HC contains.
Yes, I think we should do it, and yes I think we should do it across the board.
I think we'll have a big, long, argument about this over on xTalk when we
decide to do it. But for now, we'll stick to HC syntax.
<snip>
OK, I'll agree to seperate messages. We'll just have to keep it within
reason. And I'd like to put them all under a namespace-like thing:
NuCard:Undo
This way, we won't clash with other names.
