At 5:59 PM +0100 on 12/6/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>That'd take care of that one scenario, but there are a bunch more. And it
>>still does not handle passing the environment to the "do" handler.
>
>Anthony,
>
> it'll need a pointer to the current stack anyway, to get its variable
>values. Or what are you referring to?

Varaibles aren't pushed on the stack. But the pointer can be passed (of
course) but some special-casing of code will be required. Maybe it won't be
so bad.

Reply via email to