>>A
>>democracy cannot vote to become an dictatorship, for
>>example.
>
>Uli might know history a little better on this one. I'm sure he can tell
>you about the late 1920's and early 1930's.
Hi,
it has to be stated. It's a much-debated part of many constitutions
whether to require democracy or not, but most modern ones limit decisions
when it comes to turning a democracy into a dictatorship. But of course,
we'd have to state explicitly what mustn't be changed, as Anthony probablie
implied with this statement. Weimar didn't have this restriction, which is
why it was so easy (although they broke the law long before Hitler when
they kept ruling using �48).
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
