At 8:11 AM +1000 on 3/21/00, Adrian Sutton wrote: >Adrian: Actually, by licencing something under the GPL it means that we >have to continue to licence it under the GPL - no other licence is >compatible with the GPL. The GPL does not take away any of the author's rights -- tha author may licence any work under any number of different licences he pleases, and no one may do a thing about it. Once the patches start comming in, though, I'm not sure about the situation. I think the FSF website covers this.
- OODL: More license talk -- progressing Mark Rauterkus
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing Mark Rauterkus
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressin... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing Mark Rauterkus
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing Mark Rauterkus
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: More license talk -- progressing DeRobertis
