Re: OODL: a fundamental idea

[DeRobertis]

At 3:06 PM +0200 on 4/5/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>I have no problem with adding this to the Interpreter. A cinch, really.
>
>Anthony,
>
> just a suggestion: Use the same code for user properties as is used for
>variables, and make sure that when support for arrays is added they work in
>user properties, too.

Of course they will :) But they won't be done like other vairables,
however; a special bit of code (a function call, actually) will be done
to get/set properties. Like everything else, they will use an OTVar,
which will be extended to support lists.