1) Replacing one $10 portable card many $100 stationary
readers is not a compelling offer for either cardholders
or smart card application developers.

2) The approach assumes that there is a FinRead reader
wherever you want to use your card AND that it has
been loaded with the applet that goes with your card. 

3) And who holds the keys for the FinRead reader?  The
keys that say what applets get loaded and therefore what
cards can be used with the reader.  Neither the cardholder
nor the application provider.  It's the bank.

4) And who does the smart card application programmer
have to go to to roll out their new application?  They
have to ask permission of and pay fees to the holder
of the keys to the FinRead reader.  Again the bank.

The bank's FinRead offer to cardholders is as follows:

"You pay me $100 for each computer on which you want
to use your card and give me control of which card
applications you can use.  In return, I will let you
use my banking application ... for which I will charge
you another fee."

The bank's FinRead offer to smart card application
providers is as follows:

"You pay me an installation fee for each card you issue and 
pay me a transaction fee for every time your card is used.
In return, I will allow your customers to use the reader
they purchased from me with your cards."

The reason we have this problem is because card manufacturers
only pay lip service to smart card standards.  Why do we think
they will behave any different when they manufacture FinRead
readers?  Just having a specification on paper is meaningless
unless there is incentive to abide by it.  There is no more
incentive to manufacture standard compliant readers than there 
is to manufacturer compliant smart cards.

Even if the FinRead readers were all electrically and
physically inter-operable, the keys that they contain
will not be.  An applet approved by CitiBank will not
be able to be loaded into a FinRead reader controlled by
NatWest.  FinRead in essence not only institutionalizes
incompatibility, it monetizes it.  The cardholder and the
smart card application provider will actually have to pay
a fee for the privilege of using a non-interoperable system.

The alternative of course is to have a FinRead reader 
connected to your computer for each smart card application
you want to use.

I must admit it's a brilliant business plan on the bank's part.
Get the customer to pay to reduce the bank's risk and at the
same time take control of who the customer does business with.

Only a clueless fool would connect a FinRead reader to their 
computer or PDA.

IMHO as always.

Cheers, Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Barkeloo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/1/02 6:50 AM
Subject: RE: [OCF]  Smart card application

Anne,

You might want to check out what the French Banks are doing through
Cartes
Bancaires with the new FinRead (Financial Reader) specifications being
promoted by the EU/EC.  The specs are at:  http://www.finread.com.

Multiple applets are embedded in the reader, keyboard, or motherboard on
a
co-processor.  In this way, no matter what card is used it can be read
and
accepted.  It basically brings ATM functionality to the PC, PDA, Mobile
phone, STB, NIC, etc., anywhere the co-processor resides.

This approach will bring down the price of the SCs, a rather large
impediment to deployment in North America.  It also brings
interoperability,
which is grossly lacking today (one-to-one relationship between the
reader
and the card).  Imagine a consumer needing to plug in a different reader
each time he/she wants to use a different card.

For example, say you have two different cards - a Visa and MasterCard.
You
want to make a purchase using the Visa card.  The reader plugged in is
the
one with your MasterCard.  Now you must unplug the MasterCard reader and
plug in the Visa reader.  The wrinkle?  Both readers are the same model
number from the same vendor!  No interoperability.  With FinRead, it is
one
reader for any card.  The match occurs within the embedded co-processor.
For each card there is an applet, not a separate reader.  This is the
ATM
functionality.

I might add that if the PC OEMs deploy this solution, the movement of
movies, music, and other digital contents can be secured.  Imagine an
applet
in the co-processor that "meters" the movement of digital content like a
utility.  The artist gets paid, the PC OEM gets a micropayment for
facilitating the transaction, and card issuer still gets its
micropayment
too.

Regards,
jb




-----Original Message-----
From: GHOSHAL,Biswajit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OCF] Smart card application


Hi Anne,

Whatever said and done, till now smart-cards are yet to become "smart"
(i.e.
- use a single card to access various kind of applications).  Card
vendors,
in collaboration with financial institutes in different countries are
implementing single-application smart-cards only.  Some intellegent
people
are developing web-apps that can interact with smart-cards.  But I don't
know of any implementation where using a single-card one can interact
with
different kind of applications...if anyone else in this mailing-list
know of
such implementation - please let others know...

Best Regards,
Biswajit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Kwong [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:55 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      [OCF]  Smart card application
>
> Hello.
>
> Could anyone let me know if there are any websites or books out there
that
> talks about how people use smartcard today and what kind of
application
> people are developing?
>
> Thanks for any info that you can provide.
>
> Anne
>
>
> ---
> > Visit the OpenCard web site at http://www.opencard.org/ for more
> > information on OpenCard---binaries, source code, documents.
> > This list is being archived at
http://www.opencard.org/archive/opencard/
>
> ! To unsubscribe from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list send an
email
> ! to
> !                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ! containing the word
> !                           unsubscribe
> ! in the body.


---
> Visit the OpenCard web site at http://www.opencard.org/ for more
> information on OpenCard---binaries, source code, documents.
> This list is being archived at
http://www.opencard.org/archive/opencard/

! To unsubscribe from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list send an
email
! to
!                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! containing the word
!                           unsubscribe
! in the body.



---
> Visit the OpenCard web site at http://www.opencard.org/ for more
> information on OpenCard---binaries, source code, documents.
> This list is being archived at
http://www.opencard.org/archive/opencard/

! To unsubscribe from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list send an
email
! to
!                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! containing the word
!                           unsubscribe 
! in the body.


---
> Visit the OpenCard web site at http://www.opencard.org/ for more
> information on OpenCard---binaries, source code, documents.
> This list is being archived at http://www.opencard.org/archive/opencard/

! To unsubscribe from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list send an email
! to
!                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! containing the word
!                           unsubscribe 
! in the body.

Reply via email to